Unattended Working Places - Part 2

Another entry in the series of unattended work places. This picture was taken in the e-lab at the campus of the Edith Cowan University in Mt. Lawley, Western Australia.

This notebook was left unattended for about 10 minutes. An attacker prepared for this kind of attacker would need approximately 10 seconds for inserting a USB stick and installing a rootkit. When working in external environments employees should never leave their notebook unattended for more than 5 minutes, depending on the security level of the data stored on it. In some cases there is really no excuse to leave the notebook unattended. When leaving the working place for short periods of time, f.e. getting a coffee, the OS should always be locked to prevent unauthorised access. However, be aware, that there are also attacks possible on locked screens.

Security is no matter of daytime

You might say, "Of course, security has to be applied 24/7", but the obvious is not the standard. An example was given by Sebastian Klipper on his blog "Klipper on Security: Ps(i)2 - Sicherheit in Informationssystemen". Thanks for sharing the content of his post by CC license.

During the night, journalist Tommaso Cerno did a short trip to the airport of Rome and shared his  experience on the web. The problem? There was no security at all. The screening lines and the security areas are freely accessible, doors secured by access codes or code cards are open, homeless people are taking a nap in the interior. Tommaso filmed the his tour through the airport and published it online: 

 

http://espresso.repubblica.it/multimedia/home/22897704.

 

It would be an easy task to smuggle weapons or drugs into the airport during night. The only risk would be that one of the homeless people could find it before the next day and take it away, so Sebastian Klipper.

Ever thought about asking for the master key?

Sebastian Klipper, Senior Information Security Consultant, recently wrote on his blog Klipper on Security about an incident he experienced in a hotel. It is quite usual to have safes in hotel rooms to store important documents. It might also be obvious that lots of these safes have master key combinations to open them in case of emergency. But, he was quite surprised as he noticed how easy it was to get the master key and that it was only 3 digits long.

One day when he wanted to open the safe with his 4 digits code, it just responded with the message "BATTERY ERROR!". Hence, he made is way down to the reception, asking for help. The friendly receptionist went upstairs with him to have a look at the safe. After demonstrating the problem, the receptionist positioned right in front of the safe started entering a code and said: 

"Enter, 0, 0, 2, Enter, Enter."

Open! That's it and after the receptionist left, Sebastian Klipper knew the master code. Sometimes the easiest way to circumvent the security system is, ask friendly for help.

Thanks very much to Sebastian Klipper who gave us the rights to publish his story with his pictures on SecurityPitfalls.

Key lesson

Berni sent us the following story from Steyr in Upper Austria. On a visit at the University of Applied Sciences she found an accessible, locked room on one of the floors. The only drawback, somebody left the keys there. 

Now, the question is, how much value does access to this room have? 

First of all, you can steal paper, but that shouldn't leave too much damage to the company. Secondly, an intruder could wait for some important documents printed out. As this room is locked during the day, it could be an interesting place for getting information. Another source of information is the key itself. Even if an attacker can't get much value out of the information in the room, she could try to copy the key or just take notes about the cuts of the key. This can enable the attacker to duplicate it or use in combination with some other keys to rebuild the master key of the university's locks.

So the key lesson of this story: never leave your keys unattended - and never leave it on the doors. :) Thanks to Berni for sending in this story and the pictures. 

Update (7/2/2010): Churchy added another security issue that wasn't mentioned in the blog posting above. An attacker could use the printer's network cable to get access to the network. This could be interesting especially in situations where you just have access to a secured WLAN that is separated from the internal LAN.

Security in Hostels

As we've already seen, there's very little security in hostels. Another example is given by Norb who discovered the next few situations in a hostel in South Korea.

 

A system that might look pretty secure for a hostel, at first, ...

... is pretty useless, if all authentication credentials are given on a sheet nearby.

But it seems that the owners of the hostel are not aware of possible threats ...

... or they are just very trustful to all the people around. :)

Stupidity of guessable Access Codes

During my trip through Australia I've discovered different security and access control systems of hostels all over the country. Unfortunately, most of them are not very secure and as a proof, I'd like to show you some of the access codes of my last hostel.

Actually, these access codes are retrieved from the doors of my rooms "40" and "35" where I have slept in. "CX90" and "CI15" are the id from the floor where the rooms are located, whereas the last part is set to the last room on the floor "48" or "38". Some of my friends have slept in room 32 and got room code "C15Z32". 

As you see, the codes are not very hard to guess and offer no security for the backpackers sleeping in there. As there was no locker available, you just could hope everybody was so friendly not to steal anything while you've been out for a few drinks.

Therefore, if you have access codes in place, they should never be guessable and of course, they should be changed from time to time, so that, in case somebody publishes the codes or gets access to these codes, your company still remains secure.

Would you trust this ATM?

Looks good from the front...

... but would you use it after you've seen that it's unprotected from the back?

I haven't thought too much about ATM security before, but it doesn't look very trustworthy, does it?